Skip to Main Content

Academic Writing and Referencing Style: How to Avoid Common Mistakes

How to Avoid Common Mistakes in a Scientific Article

  • Before Writing:
    • Not choosing a target journal early on, which leads to misalignment in scope, audience, and formatting.
       
  • During Writing:
    • Multitasking and distractions, which reduce focus and productivity.
    • Lack of organization in thoughts and notes. 
    • Neglecting physical and mental health.  
       
  • Paragraph Structure:
    • Poorly structured paragraphs with unclear topics, insufficient support, and weak conclusions. 
    • Use of verbiage, unnecessary repetition, and lack of clear connections between ideas. 
       
  • Clarity and Style:
    • Lack of conciseness and clarity. 
    • Incorrect or ineffective use of linking words. 
    • Repetitive use of words and phrases, indicating a limited vocabulary. 
       
  • Visual Elements:
    • Inadequate selection and formatting of figures and tables.  
       
  • Specific Sections:
    • Introduction: Lack of logical flow, excessive detail, confusing terminology, outdated references, and raising irrelevant problems. 
    • Methods: Lack of logical order, unclear description of variables and statistical analysis. 
    • Results: Not describing the sample, using incomprehensible visuals, repeating data, omitting data, and inappropriate statistical analysis. 
    • Discussion: Repeating previous sections, not focusing on the study's findings, lack of theoretical/practical implications, introducing new data, unsubstantiated speculation, and recommendations not based on results. 
    • Conclusion: Not addressing the study's objectives.  

----

Don't forget:

1. Be clear and direct: Every sentence should contribute directly to the central point, leaving no room for ambiguity.

2. Follow the journal’s instructions like a checklist. It's not "extra work". It's showing respect to your future reviewers: By meticulously adhering to these guidelines, authors demonstrate professionalism and respect for the reviewers' time, increasing the likelihood of a smoother review process.

3. Tell a story with your data: Step-by-step approach helps create a narrative that guides the reader through the significance of the research.

4. Polish your grammar and structure: Paying close attention to grammar and structure ensures that the writing is professional, easy to read, and accurately conveys the intended meaning.

5. Double-check your references and ethical declarations: Ensuring the accuracy of references and ethical declarations is crucial for maintaining the credibility of the research and avoiding potential issues during the review process.

Resource: https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:AP:706ee306-d08b-4316-b2d5-9edfe566c80d